Published on April 14, 2022

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has exacerbated inflation, which was already rising. The big questions now are how far will the Fed be willing to go to slow inflation, and how will the market react as rates increase?

Encore! Encore?!

The geopolitical landscape changed dramatically in the first quarter, as news headlines shifted from the global pandemic to the war in Ukraine. Among the many consequences of Russia’s invasion, skyrocketing oil prices have triggered fears of runaway inflation, and we are now left to debate the impact on growth and inflation in the U.S. Meanwhile, we have yet to see the supply chain issues completely resolve, though we appear to be in somewhat better stead than three months ago.

The Fed has finally changed its tone and now appears to be singly focused on containing inflation. It has an unenviable task, but it is partly to blame for the current situation as its exceedingly accommodative monetary policy over the last year has left it in this very tenuous position. The question is now: Is the Fed fully committed to stopping inflation? If so, is it willing to sacrifice growth and possibly even drive the U.S. economy into recession?

In our prior outlook, we highlighted the options the Fed has in removing accommodation, and we believe these options to be more robust than the singular “inflation-killing” tone the Fed has recently adopted. To recap, these options are:

  • To counteract an overheating economy, the Fed can raise the target fed funds rate.
  • To contain inflation, the Fed can reduce its balance sheet more aggressively, which would effectively raise longer maturity rates while maintaining some “dry powder” for raising shorter rates more slowly.
  • To counteract both an overheating economy and inflation, it can begin with hikes to lift the target rate off the zero bound but ultimately use both levers to affect the outcome that provides the softest landing for the economy.

Sadly, implementation of a dual-pronged quantitative tightening plan requires a level of finesse that the Fed is not known for. The Fed has taken to telegraphing its rate forecasts (“the dot plots”) as well as its open market operations in a way that makes changing course very difficult. In our opinion this policy of keeping the markets hyper-informed can be an impediment to implementing policy in the most efficient manner, but we doubt this is something that will change. If it did, imagine the market uproar – “does the Fed suddenly have something to hide?”

Thus far, the Fed’s approach has not been particularly well-received, as this year the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index delivered its worst quarterly return since 1980. In addition, the Treasury curve inverted, with shorter-maturity yields resting above longer-maturity yields – a rarity for this stage of a tightening cycle. In our view, the inverted curve reflects a policy error: leaving rates too low for too long, and then potentially hiking too late, and probably too much.

Were the Fed to adopt the balanced solution we advocate, it would be able to normalize the yield curve by selling its longer-dated bonds, restoring it to a shape that is more in line with market expectations. Steepening the curve would also address broader market fears that an inverted curve is a harbinger of recession, and it would allow the Fed to make fewer, shallower hikes at the short end. It would also allow the Fed to sell its longer-maturity holdings at lower yields than its shorter-maturity holdings, which would reduce the duration of its portfolio.

Instead, the Fed has made it clear that its preferred method of balance sheet reduction will come via runoff. In other words, it will simply allow its shorter-dated assets to mature over the next few years, which will confer none of the benefits we have just mentioned.

Given that the Fed is committed to its approach (including the probability of multiple 50 basis point rate hikes), the question is what does the bond market do for an encore? Will it deliver another quarter of painful losses, or will it find its footing and adapt? In our view, rate and spread volatility are likely to remain elevated. We expect the market will react to economic data prints or headline zingers from the Fed speaker du jour by extrapolating months of rate hikes based on a spot observation or quote. We believe the data that will matter most, besides the obvious inflation data, are surveys of economic activity, wages, and employment. We also believe that the notion of a 2% neutral inflation target is a figment of the past, and that the Fed would be happy with a 3% target in the intermediate term.

It is worth noting that we see a few positive signs that inflation may begin to cool on its own. In particular, there are three market factors that we believe have the potential to mitigate the current rise in prices. First, while nominal wages are rising over 5% annually, a CPI of 8.5% suggests negative real wage growth. Negative real wage growth is incompatible with the post-pandemic spending behavior we have observed. Second, higher mortgage rates should also dampen unsustainable growth in home prices and slow economic activity related to housing (or the wealth effect derived from housing or other assets that have shown signs of froth). Finally, as we approach the one-year anniversary of this inflation episode, base effects could dampen year-over-year comparisons of price data.

Longer-dated interest rates will determine where the market settles in its expectation for longer-term inflation. The TIPS market suggests we have some way to go in repricing the Treasury curve, and while we are sympathetic to a flatter curve, we feel this might happen at somewhat higher overall rates from here. In particular, we find shorter rates most vulnerable, unless the Fed changes its tack and embraces asset sales as a core part of its normalization strategy. Spreads across investment grade asset classes appear more compelling than at the start of the year, but challenges loom for risk-takers until the Fed can slow (or stop) the acceleration we have seen across all inflation measures. Higher volatility requires wider spreads as compensation, especially for MBS.

We would like to thank you again for your confidence in the team and welcome any questions or comments you may have.

Eddy Vataru

Chief Investment Officer – Total Return & Lead Portfolio Manager

John Sheehan

Vice President & Portfolio Manager

Daniel Oh

Vice President & Portfolio Manager

Written by

Eddy Vataru

Chief Investment Officer – Total Return & Lead Portfolio Manager

Eddy Vataru

Chief Investment Officer – Total Return & Lead Portfolio Manager

Prior to joining Osterweis Capital Management in 2016, Eddy Vataru worked in senior management positions at Incapture, LLC and Citadel, LLC. Before that he spent over 11 years at BlackRock (formerly Barclays Global Investors, BGI), where his last position was as Managing Director and Head of U.S. Rates and Mortgages. While in this role, BGI worked with the U.S. Treasury in implementing its Agency MBS Purchase Program, buying mortgages for the U.S. government from 2008-2009.

Over the course of his career as a fixed income investor, Mr. Vataru has developed extensive experience in managing passive, active, and hedge fund portfolios.

Mr. Vataru is a principal of the firm and the lead Portfolio Manager for the total return fixed income strategy. He is also a Portfolio Manager for the growth & income and flexible balanced strategies. He regularly publishes market commentary and has been named a Venerated Voice on – a designation reserved for the most widely read authors on that site.

Mr. Vataru graduated from California Institute of Technology (B.S. in Chemistry & Economics) and from Olin Business School at Washington University in St. Louis (M.B.A.). Mr. Vataru holds the CFA designation.

John Sheehan

Vice President & Portfolio Manager

John Sheehan

Vice President & Portfolio Manager

Prior to joining Osterweis Capital Management in 2018, John Sheehan spent more than 20 years working at Citigroup, first as Managing Director responsible for Investment Grade Syndicate in New York City, where he advised issuers on accessing funding in the corporate bond market. Later at Citigroup, he was Managing Director in charge of West Coast Investment Grade Sales in San Francisco, where he covered several of the largest U.S. investment grade credit investors.

Mr. Sheehan is a principal of the firm and a Portfolio Manager for the total return fixed income strategy.

Mr. Sheehan graduated from Georgetown University (B.A. in Economics). Mr. Sheehan holds the CFA designation.

Daniel Oh

Vice President & Portfolio Manager

Daniel Oh

Vice President & Portfolio Manager

Prior to joining Osterweis Capital Management in 2018, Daniel Oh spent over eight years as a Director at Estabrook Capital Management in New York City and was the lead Portfolio Manager of the Estabrook Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund. Before that he was at Merrill Lynch & Co. as an Associate in Prime/Alt-A-Non-Agency Mortgage Trading. Prior to that, he held positions at Seneca Financial Group and Morgan Stanley.

Mr. Oh’s professional history includes experience in investment grade corporate credit, non-agency and whole loan mortgages, structured credit, and distressed investments.

Mr. Oh is a principal of the firm and a Portfolio Manager for the total return fixed income strategy.

Mr. Oh graduated from Columbia University (B.A. in Economics/Political Science) and from the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan (M.B.A.).

Related Insight

Invest With Us

For more information about this strategy, please send us an email or call us at (800) 700-3316.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This commentary contains the current opinions of the authors as of the date above which are subject to change at any time. This commentary has been distributed for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation or offer of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

No part of this article may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of Osterweis Capital Management.

Consumer Price Index (CPI) reflects the weighted average of prices of a basket of consumer goods and services, such as transportation, food and medical care.

The fed funds rate is the rate at which depository institutions (banks) lend their reserve balances to other banks on an overnight basis.

The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (BC Agg) is an unmanaged index which is widely regarded as the standard for measuring U.S. investment grade bond market performance. This index does not incur expenses. The index includes reinvestment of dividends and/or interest income.

Investment grade bonds are those with high and medium credit quality assigned by a ratings agency.

Spread is the difference in yield between a risk-free asset such as a Treasury bond and another security with the same maturity but of lesser quality. Option-Adjusted Spread is a spread calculation for securities with embedded options and takes into account that expected cash flows will fluctuate as interest rates change.

A mortgage backed security (MBS) is a type of asset-backed security that is secured by a mortgage or collection of mortgages.

Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) are a type of Treasury security issued by the U.S. government that is indexed to inflation in order to protect investors from a decline in the purchasing power of their money. As inflation rises, TIPS adjust in price to maintain its real value.

Duration measures the sensitivity of a fixed income security’s price (or the aggregate market value of a portfolio of fixed income securities) to changes in interest rates. Fixed income securities with longer durations generally have more volatile prices than those of comparable quality with shorter durations.

A yield curve is a graph that plots bond yields vs. maturities, at a set point in time, assuming the bonds have equal credit quality. In the U.S., the yield curve generally refers to that of Treasuries.

Holdings and sector allocations may change at any time due to ongoing portfolio management. References to specific investments should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the securities by the Osterweis Total Return Fund or Osterweis Capital Management.

A basis point (bp) is a unit that is equal to 1/100th of 1%.

The Osterweis Funds are available by prospectus only. The Funds’ investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses must be considered carefully before investing. The summary and statutory prospectuses contain this and other important information about the Funds. You may obtain a summary or statutory prospectus by calling toll free at (866) 236-0050, or by visiting Please read the prospectus carefully before investing to ensure the Fund is appropriate for your goals and risk tolerance.

Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.

The Osterweis Total Return Fund may invest in fixed income securities which are subject to credit, default, extension, interest rate and prepayment risks. It may also make investments in derivatives that may involve certain costs and risks such as liquidity, interest rate, market, credit, management and the risk that a position could not be closed when most advantageous. The Fund may invest in in debt securities that are un-rated or rated below investment grade. Lower-rated securities may present an increased possibility of default, price volatility or illiquidity compared to higher-rated securities. Investments in foreign and emerging market securities involve greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks and differences in accounting methods. These risks may increase for emerging markets. Leverage may cause the effect of an increase or decrease in the value of the portfolio securities to be magnified and the fund to be more volatile than if leverage was not used. Investments in preferred securities have an inverse relationship with changes in the prevailing interest rate. Investments in Asset Backed and Mortgage Backed Securities include additional risks that investors should be aware of such as credit risk, prepayment risk, possible illiquidity and default, as well as increased susceptibility to adverse economic developments. It may also make investments in derivatives that may involve certain costs and risks such as liquidity, interest rate, market, credit, management and the risk that a position could not be closed when most advantageous. The Fund may invest in municipal securities which are subject to the risk of default.

Osterweis Capital Management is the adviser to the Osterweis Funds, which are distributed by Quasar Distributors, LLC. [OSTE-20220412-0485]